Whoever
controls the media, the images, controls the culture.
Allen Ginsberg
The zeitgeist in America is held in high
esteem, and is quite an eclectic collection of things. Last week, the finale of
Breaking Bad seemed to be followed by almost everyone, and those who hadn’t
seen it where brushed aside as uneducated and uninformed cultural refugees. Everyone
was talking about it, tweeting about it, interviewing the cast and crew,
counting down and spoiler alerting like mad. Breaking Bad, with all its writing
quality and savvy storytelling represents the pinnacle of American television
culture right now, maybe ever. People were sad to see it go, because to have
something so well-crafted and intelligent to watch every week was comforting in
both the act of watching it and the knowledge that it was there.
Yet I remember a time when the
most talked about thing on television was six orange idiots walking around a
boardwalk in New Jersey, romanticizing pettiness and objectification, pouring
moronic ideals into our minds about nothing that mattered. Jersey Shore to me
represented everything that was wrong with American society in today’s day and
age, and although I do appreciate that it was viewed through different lenses
by different people, there is no way that it didn’t damage the outlook of some.
Now, there is a section of the
audiences of these two television programs that actually cross over. There are
people that consumed the Jersey Shore from its first episode to its last that
could tell you the name of every Breaking Bad character and their respective
cast member. That is to say, it is unfair to judge the intelligence of an
audience based on the intelligence of a show. There is however, a difference,
in my mind, between art and entertainment. While art can be entertaining, I don’t
believe entertainment, done for its own sake, can be artistic.
These two television shows
illustrate this perfectly, because while cases can be made for both shows being
entertaining, only one could be considered an artistic achievement.
Now, perhaps it is unfair to
compare the two just because they are both presented on the same medium. One is
perhaps meant to be pulpy and shallow, the other, not so much. But maybe that
is one of the many great purposes pieces of art like Breaking Bad and its ilk
can serve, it can be a bounty hunter of drivel, it can elevate the consciousness
of its viewers to the point where the next time the media tries to serve them
up a “Teen Mom” or a “Two and a Half Men” they look upon it with distaste and
ask for something better.
Television
shows can only survive if they are watched, and if we ask for something more as
a culture, it will be produced.
To be popular art must be entertaining and accessible, but entertainment to achieve the same does not need to be art.
ReplyDeleteBut sometimes base entertainment can masquerade as art.
People think Nicholas Sparks is art, people are not correct.